By Calvin House | Published November 12, 2012 | Posted in Uncategorized |
If a payment to an employee is reimbursement for expenses the employee incurred on behalf of the employer it is not wages, and not taxable. Because it can be burdensome to track and reimburse small expenses exactly, many employers pay employees a flat per diem amount to be used for expenses. If the per diem Read More
Read MoreA January 2012 post described a case pending in the California Court of Appeal that involved the legality of rounding time worked to the nearest tenth of an hour for purposes of computing wages. In See’s Candy Shops, Inc. v. Superior Court, Case No. D060710 (Oct. 29, 2012), the San Diego division of the Fourth District Court of Read More
Read MoreElection day 2012 is just around the corner. A recent New York Times articlereports that employers have been emboldened by the ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 50 (2010) to express their political views to their employees. Employers in California should be careful in how they go about doing so. Cal. Lab. Code section 1101 provides: “No Read More
Read MoreThe U.S. Supreme Court‘s new term got under way on October 1, the first Monday in October. Here are the employment cases for which the Court has so far granted review. We will update this posting with developments in these cases and any other employment cases for which review is granted. Kloeckner v. Solis, No. 11-184. The question Read More
Read MoreAlthough the National Labor Relations Board spends much of its time dealing with union vs. management issues, recent publicity about its rulings on social media in the workplace have reminded us that its jurisdiction extends into non-union environments. This post explains the source and contours of that jurisdiction. The NLRB exercises jurisdiction over all private Read More
Read MoreEmployers concerned about how their customers and other employees may react to the use by some employees of languages other than English may wish to impose an English only policy. The EEOC recently settled a case that involved allegedly improper language policies at a large hospital in California’s San Joaquin Valley. The press release announcing Read More
Read MoreFederal law preempts all state laws that relate to “any employee benefit plan” covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. Employers may use the preemptive effect of ERISA to avoid California law on the accrual and vesting of vacation benefits, if they observe the rules for making vacation pay part of an ERISA benefit Read More
Read MoreThe Legislature and Governor Brown have completed their law-making activities for the 2011-2012 regular legislative session. The following laws that affect employers will become effective January 1, 2013: Social media: AB 1844 bars employers from requiring or requesting an employee or applicant for employment to disclose a user name or password for the purpose of accessing personal social Read More
Read MoreThe Fair Labor Standards Act exempts from the overtime requirement “any employee with respect to whom the Secretary of Transportation has power to establish qualifications and maximum hours of service.” 29 U.S.C. section 213(b)(1). This is known as the motor carrier exemption. The California wage orders contain a similar exemption. See, for example, Wage Order No. 9-2001, Read More
Read MoreThe workers compensation system provides the exclusive remedy against an employer for an employee who is injured at work, except when it does not. Here, we explore the extent to which the workers compensation remedy preempts tort and other remedies against an employee’s employer and fellow employees. Through the “compensation bargain,” “the employer assumes liability Read More
Read More