By Calvin House | Published May 25, 2013 | Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Rest periods must be separately compensated
Search Site
Recent Blog Posts
Rest periods must be separately compensated
Safeway paid its truck drivers on what it called a piece rate basis. Pay was based on (1) mileage rates that varied by number of miles driven, time of day, and location, (2) fixed rates for certain tasks, (3) an hourly rate for a predetermined amount of minutes for other tasks, and (4) an hourly Read More
Read More
Are Per Diem Payments Part of Payroll?
If a payment to an employee is reimbursement for expenses the employee incurred on behalf of the employer it is not wages, and not taxable. Because it can be burdensome to track and reimburse small expenses exactly, many employers pay employees a flat per diem amount to be used for expenses. If the per diem Read More
Read More
Rounding Permissible Under California Wage and Hour Law
A January 2012 post described a case pending in the California Court of Appeal that involved the legality of rounding time worked to the nearest tenth of an hour for purposes of computing wages. In See’s Candy Shops, Inc. v. Superior Court, Case No. D060710 (Oct. 29, 2012), the San Diego division of the Fourth District Court of Read More
Read More
Employer Electioneering
Election day 2012 is just around the corner. A recent New York Times articlereports that employers have been emboldened by the ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 50 (2010) to express their political views to their employees. Employers in California should be careful in how they go about doing so. Cal. Lab. Code section 1101 provides: “No Read More
Read More
Employment Cases on the Supreme Court’s 2012-13 Docket
The U.S. Supreme Court‘s new term got under way on October 1, the first Monday in October. Here are the employment cases for which the Court has so far granted review. We will update this posting with developments in these cases and any other employment cases for which review is granted. Kloeckner v. Solis, No. 11-184. The question Read More
Read More
Why Does the NLRB Get Involved in Non-Union Workplaces?
Although the National Labor Relations Board spends much of its time dealing with union vs. management issues, recent publicity about its rulings on social media in the workplace have reminded us that its jurisdiction extends into non-union environments. This post explains the source and contours of that jurisdiction. The NLRB exercises jurisdiction over all private Read More
Read More
English Only Policies
Employers concerned about how their customers and other employees may react to the use by some employees of languages other than English may wish to impose an English only policy. The EEOC recently settled a case that involved allegedly improper language policies at a large hospital in California’s San Joaquin Valley. The press release announcing Read More
Read More
ERISA Preemption Of Vacation Policies
Federal law preempts all state laws that relate to “any employee benefit plan” covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. Employers may use the preemptive effect of ERISA to avoid California law on the accrual and vesting of vacation benefits, if they observe the rules for making vacation pay part of an ERISA benefit Read More
Read More
California Employment Law Changes for 2013
The Legislature and Governor Brown have completed their law-making activities for the 2011-2012 regular legislative session. The following laws that affect employers will become effective January 1, 2013: Social media: AB 1844 bars employers from requiring or requesting an employee or applicant for employment to disclose a user name or password for the purpose of accessing personal social Read More
Read More
Exemptions from Wage and Hour Requirements: Motor Carrier
The Fair Labor Standards Act exempts from the overtime requirement “any employee with respect to whom the Secretary of Transportation has power to establish qualifications and maximum hours of service.” 29 U.S.C. section 213(b)(1). This is known as the motor carrier exemption. The California wage orders contain a similar exemption. See, for example, Wage Order No. 9-2001, Read More
Read More