By Calvin House | Published March 27, 2011 | Posted in Uncategorized |
Two Metson Marine employees worked 14-day hitches on Metson’s ships providing emergency clean up of oils spills and other environmentally hazardous discharges off the California coast. During their hitches, the employees were required to sleep on the ships. Metson allotted 12 hours out of the day to work, and 12 hours to off-duty (three hours Read More
Read MoreWorkplace bullying got some national attention recently when a committee of the Maryland legislature held a hearing on Senate Bill 600, a version of the Healthy Workplace Bill, authored by Prof. David Yamada of Suffolk University Law School. According to the bill’s website, it has been introduced in 20 states, and is actively under consideration in 13. Read More
Read MoreAmerican Medical Response of Connecticut earned notoriety when the NLRB charged it with an unfair labor practice for having fired an employee who posted negative remarks about her supervisor on her personal Facebook page in October 2010. She had posted the remarks after being denied union representation for an interaction with her supervisor. The posting drew supportive Read More
Read MoreThe Supreme Court’s recent decision in Staub v. Proctor Hospital, Case No. 09-400 (Mar. 1, 2011) discusses the standards for proof of motive in a claim for discrimination based on military obligations. This prompts consideration of the role of motive in all sorts of employment cases. In Staub, two low level supervisors were hostile to the military Read More
Read MoreMany employers prefer arbitration to lawsuits and administrative hearings. Although the law permits employers to require arbitration of employment disputes, California courts have imposed some restrictions. See, for example, Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc., 4 Cal.4th 83, 6 P.3d 669, 99 Cal.Rptr.2d 745 (2000) (requiring an arbitration agreement to include certain procedural protections for employment Read More
Read MoreAs a general rule, California employers must allow their employees two 10-minute rest periods and a 30-minute meal period during a regular work day. If the employer does not do so, under Labor Code section 226.7, it “shall pay the employee one additional hour of pay at the employee’s regular rate of compensation for each work Read More
Read MoreA recent appellate decision explains how California employers may implement an explicit mutual wage agreement that provides for payment of a weekly salary to cover both regular hours and overtime hours. The decision in Arechiga v. Dolores Press, Inc., Case No. B218171 (Cal. Ct. App. 2/7/2011) is available here. California law requires employers to pay overtime to Read More
Read MoreThe California Supreme Court has ruled that trial courts may review the legal correctness of arbitration decisions involving employment claims based on statutory rights. This marks another swing in the pendulum marking judicial attitudes toward arbitration. Until the enactment of the Federal Arbitration Act in 1925 American courts were hostile to the ouster of judicial Read More
Read MoreOn Monday, April 19, 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court heard argument in a case that involves public employee privacy interests in electronic messages delivered to pagers. The City of Ontario had audited text messages sent to pagers issued to its police officers to determine if the pagers were being misused for personal purposes. The Ninth Read More
Read MoreIn these tough times, when employers are looking for every possible way to save money and students are desperate for jobs, be careful about practices that might run afoul of the wage and hour rules. Employers are frequently approached by students who are willing to work for nothing in order to make contacts that will Read More
Read More